Hello,

I am @KatoDamuko, who has recently been appointed as a Super Moderator by the management team.

Currently, there is a shortage of active moderators on the KidKool channel, so we have decided to recruit new moderators.

We are looking forward to applications from those who can actively review the channel and submission videos. Those who have record videos are especially welcome. Please apply by commenting in this forum.

As for the appropriate number of moderators to hire, I am inexperienced and do not have a set theory. However, should any issues arise (such as receiving a large number of applications),

we will discuss these as they occur in the forum.

Thank you.

================

こんにちは。

この度、運営の方からスーパーモデレータに任命していただいた @KatoDamuko です。

現在、KidKool のチャンネルではアクティブなモデレータが不足しているため 新たなモデレータを募集することにしました。

チャンネルおよび申請動画の確認を積極的に行える方の応募をお待ちしています。 記録動画をお持ちの方は特に歓迎いたします。 応募は、こちらのフォーラムにコメントでお願いします。

採用する適切な人数について、経験が不足していてセオリーがわかっていませんが、 何らかの問題（例えば、多数の応募がある場合など）が発生した際には、 その都度、フォーラムで相談させていただきたいと思います。

よろしくお願いします。

Dear @authorblues,

First and foremost, I would like to express my gratitude for your dedicated efforts as a Super Moderator. I have submitted a speedrun video for 'Kid Kool' and would like to discuss a concern regarding it.

It has been over three weeks since my submission, and the verification process is yet to be completed. As a moderator myself, I am technically able to approve my own submission. However, in the interest of maintaining fairness, I prefer that another moderator reviews it. I understand that self-approval is generally not recommended, and I believe in adhering to this principle.

If your busy schedule is preventing you from attending to the verification task, might I suggest considering the recruitment of additional moderators? I believe this could contribute positively to the healthy growth of our community.

I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this matter. Thank you for your continued support and cooperation.

Sincerely,

@KatoDamuko

I submitted a KidKool video a month ago, but there was no response from the moderator. So, I contacted the administration and they made me a moderator. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Before I approve my record video, there's something I'd like to get everyone's opinion on right away.

The following URL is a video of my record: https://www.speedrun.com/kid_kool/run/ywr82k3m

During my SpeedRuns, I start with an initial value of the timer increased by 0.75 seconds. This is because I found it challenging to start the timer simultaneously with the press of the start button using the AutoSplit tool I'm using.

When checking the recorded video, there was approximately a 0.75-second gap between when I pressed the start button and the character started moving, and when the AutoSplit tool was able to start measuring as the screen transitioned. Therefore, I added the same number of seconds to the timer.

I would like to hear your opinion on whether or not this decision is appropriate.

1か月前に KidKool の動画を投稿させてもらいましたが、 モデレータからの反応がなかったため、運営に連絡したところ、 モデレータにしていただきました。 よろしくお願いします。

早速ですが、私の記録動画を承認する前に、 皆さんに意見を伺いたいことがあります。

以下の URL は私の記録動画になります https://www.speedrun.com/kid_kool/run/ywr82k3m

私は SpeedRun の際、タイマーを 0.75 秒加算した初期値で行っています。 これは、使用している AutoSplit ツールでは、スタートボタン押下と同時にタイマーを開始するのが困難だと考えたからです。

録画した動画を確認すると、 スタートボタンを押してキャラクターが動き始めてから、AutoSplit ツールが計測開始可能な画面に遷移するまでの間が おおよそ 0.75 秒だったため、タイマーも同じ秒数加算しました。

この判断が妥当かどうか、意見を伺いたいです。

The other day, I completed a speedrun of the GB version of Tower of Druaga and created a digest of the record time of 32:18.

As there is currently no page or category for the GB version of Tower of Druaga on SpeedRun.com, I am considering creating a new category for "any% (GB)" here.

If you have any thoughts or opinions, please let me know.

Hello, my name is KatoDamuko.

I am writing to request the addition of a new category for the PC Engine version (TG-16) of the Tower of Druaga, and to update the contents of the Any % category accordingly.

The new categories are as follows

• Update: Any % -> Any% - Easy
• Add: Any% - Normal
• Add: Any% - Hard
• Add: Any% - Pro Game
• Add: All Main Treasures - Easy

The PC Engine version has four difficulty levels. Currently, Any% is practically a category for Easy difficulty only. Since these four difficulty levels are different in terms of gameplay and appeal, we believe that a record of each is necessary. We believe that each of them should have its own record. The PC Engine version has four difficulty levels, but The current Any% record is practically a category just for the Easy difficulty level. Since these four difficulty levels have different gameplay and appeal, we believe that a record for each of them is necessary. We believe that each of these four difficulty levels should have its own record.

In addition to Any%, there is also "All Main Treasures." However, I personally think that only one type of "All Main Treasure" is necessary because I think that only "Easy" difficulty level is sufficient for this category. In addition to Any%, there is also "All Main Treasures." I personally think that only one type is needed for now, as I think that this one should only be on easy difficulty.

I have already uploaded my own video recordings of the five categories I have proposed, so please refer to them.

• Any% - Easy:
• Any% - Normal:
• Any% - Hard:
• Any% - Pro Game:
• All Main Treasures - Easy:

Thank you for your consideration.