I retimed both runs with the YT Frame Timer. The first I got a 5.233, and the second I got a 6.200/5.350.

In the second run the camera does move very little to the right, almost unnoticeable before the player starts moving forward. In that case if it was retimed with the first input of the camera in the beginning the time should be a 6.200 if not it's a 5.350.

They're both retimed to 5.200?

I think both need to be retimed by mods, if not... by me.

Two things: 1.Runs are checked by like at least 2-5 moderators for mostly every run. 2.I will re-time these runs again several times and I'll get back to you.

Thanx for actually retiming.

Wait, so you're telling me my time is actually faster than that other guy's run? POGCHAMP

I love how I re-submit a WR run to fix the video link, then the run is incorrectly timed by over a second by a different mod then in the original and then labeled 'obsolete'. So many people have incorrectly timed runs on the boards, it's crazy. So many mods using different un-accurate frame timers.

SpikyLlama, yeah your run was way faster then the other guys, his run was retimed to a 5.200, but was actually a 6.200. Mods can't accurately retime runs properly.

Bruh I'm the one who retimed it :(. And most of us use Slush Puppy or manually retime which are accurate ways of retiming, it's just that the end timing was incorrect. And most runs are retimed correctly.

I've submitted 2 runs and they weren't timed correctly, I've also seen at least 4-5 runs not timed correctly on the boards aswell (Most now retimed.)

Anyways, I don't run anything on here anymore (for particular reasons) so it don't really matter to me I guess, but just wanted to state that; 1/4 the mods on here don't retime runs properly - that or they keep on doing typos.