Welp looks like im gonna have to reclaim my third place spot now, this is not gonna be fun lol
I've been thinking about this issue for a bit, and I decided the best way to solve this issue is to split the Glitchless% Category into Glitchless% (Super Jumps) and Glitchless% (No Super Jumps) to help accommodate for both sides of the discussion. Hopefully this is a welcomed change but I completely understand if some people do not like this decision.
I'll have to think about it a bit more then. While I do understand why some see it as a glitch, the issue is more a question of "Is it a big enough glitch to be in glitchless" since I meant glitchless more like no major glitches so that's why I'm allowing it for now. But I'll think about it a bit more if some of the players are saying that they consider it a glitch.
While the run appears to be legitimate, I'd recommend using a better recording software or uploading the video to YouTube if youre able to. Since either the recording software or the site you're using caused the video to have a low framerate
I'm terribly sorry about this issue. After I designed the basics for this page I had to go to bed and then I completely forgot to finish the Minimum Boxes category, I will try finish it ASAP. It might take a bit for me to fully finish it since I have to learn how to add the part to say how many boxes were used but I will make sure that the Minimum Boxes Page is fixed
Amazing Job, some of these skips I never would've even thought of doing, I didn't even know some of these were possible