This has been discussed by me, you, and Roach. If we were to create an Easy% Leaderboard as to which only runs done on Easy difficulty can be accepted but keep it separately from the main leaderboard [any%], then we can move for it as a category extension with approval. 3 runs should be enough to kick start it.

I'd be down for having a separate leaderboard for Easy difficulty.

But should we do it just for glitchless? Since the any% skips actually make it a lot more fair with easy vs. extreme and I think any% should still stay that way.

For glitchless I 100% understand the split between easy and extreme. Hadn't thought about glitchless category in this case yet tbh.

@muikula I'm for having both any% and glitchless boards having their easy difficulty runs separated. The idea of having the categories "extended" in this particular case means that runners that don't want to go the extra mile to master Extreme difficulty will have a board that's accessible and exclusive to them. This is to say they would be completely separate from the main boards which would remain intact.

Would likely go with the convention "Any% Easy" and "Glitchless Easy".

@muikula so what's the thought on this then? Can we declare a separate leaderboard for runs done on the easy difficulty for both main categories at this time? Reiterating the idea that these are not exclusive entirely of the regular categories as a whole [meaning an easy run can be posted on both its category AND easy extension]. If a volume is to be met to establish it, then I will point again to the example of the Sly Cooper Community only needing a small number of submissions to declare an extension. Either that or manual re-submission/flagging/inclusion of older runs done on Easy on the current boards to populate it [you may know if this is possible].