New 100% Definition Suggestion
6 years ago
Canada

So I'm not sure why this is the case, but the current 100% definition involves beating the game TWICE, once on normal and getting all diamonds, then again on EX. This seems ridiculous to me, and I think the lack of any runs on that category at all shows this.

I think that the 100% category should just be completing normal mode while collecting all diamonds.

South Carolina, USA

I think the rules for 100% are fair enough. I hope to have a 100% run submitted soon :)

Germany

Even tho i runned it like ages ago i think we should promote our game in some way. It's fun, short, challenging and overall a good game for beginner. But the question is how we do it. If it's gains more popularity, more the runs are coming. :D

South Carolina, USA

There needs to be optimization I think. I think is potential for a lot of time-saves that no one has found yet.

Canada

Well, it's been over a year, and there are still no 100% runs with the current definition. All I'm suggesting is for 100% to be All Diamonds + Beat normal mode. There could be another category for normal mode + EX mode, but it doesn't make sense to call that 100%. I'm fine with it existing.

South Carolina, USA

Well 10 months later I have come to agree with you, because I've been trying to run 100% for a long time now and usually give up because of the length.

Norway

And now, five years later, since there still were no runs with the old 100% rules, I have now changed it so that you only need to beat normal mode + collecting all the gems.

sonicyellow likes this
Game stats
Followers
28
Runs
34
Players
20
Latest threads
Posted 9 months ago
5 replies
Posted 11 months ago
0 replies
Posted 11 months ago
6 replies
Moderators