Komentarze
CanadaRyason558 years ago

Really, if we're gonna divide by glitches at all (and if it's going to be such a problem), we should divide it as many ways as we can. As in: Glitched, No Stage 0, No Super Jump, and Glitchless. This would basically give a place for all of the runs we do, ¤and¤ would better handle the version divide. V1.01e would have Glitchless and No Super Jump, and V1.0 would have Glitched and No Stage 0. Of course, this is assuming that we can make another layer of categories.

(Though, really, I would like to know what the problem with Stage 0 is)

CanadaRyason558 years ago

The thing with Stage 0 is that it feels like you guys are treating it like something dirty; Like some sort of forbidden black art that will forever taint your soul if you use it. So for me, having actually figured out the glitch and put use to it... It's kind of disappointing that really nobody else (besides ZeldaFan) is using it. And it wasn't just me either; we ¤all¤ contributed to it's conception and making it what it is today. It's something we can say we discovered, over Super Jumping which has basically been a thing for as long as the game's been around. And yet, half of us are wanting a category that bans it exclusively...

This is why I proposed the glitchless category, because not only would this give a place for glitches like Super Jump and Stage 0, it would also handle the stupid version divide we have, allowing current version runs to be glitchless, and 1.0 runs to be glitched. The thing with this, though, is that if our 1.0 runners perpetually refuse to use Stage 0, it would only put them at a disadvantage.

O Ryason55
Dołączył
8 years ago
Online
7 years ago
Przebiegi
5
Uruchomione gry
Gensokyo no Nazo
Gensokyo no Nazo
Ostatnia próba 8 years ago
4
Przebiegi
Serious Sam 3: BFE
Serious Sam 3: BFE
Ostatnia próba 12 years ago
1
Przebieg
Obserwowane gry
Gensokyo no Nazo
Gensokyo no Nazo
Ostatnia wizyta 7 years ago
295
wizyty
Serious Sam 3: BFE
Serious Sam 3: BFE
Ostatnia wizyta 7 years ago
12
wizyty