I may or may not drop out, since the date has not been determined and I'm very busy during may, also I have to make sure my capture card doesnt stop working randomly again. Just a warning :)

Super mods: GC4ever4001- he's a leader, in just a month he's helped peacefully reslove a few disputes. He's very active in the community, very knowledgeable of the game, and overall is a good person to look up to

Mods: Sirnimbus: he's very active in the community, I always see him in chat when people are doing runs, and I believe he will do a great job as a mod

Theofficialskozzy- he is super knowledgeable with the game, has been very inviting into the community, he's been around for a long time, isn't afraid to speak his mind, and overall has a lot of respect from me

No more changes pls

I agree with gc, we've been making a lot of descions as a community and we should have a vote so it could be more fair

may i ask whats the difference between mods and super mods?

I don't think we should only take them down if the runner gives consent, it wouldn't be fair for those who did take down their times already. We can't just let some people keep their times and remove others, it wouldn't be fair. If by the end of the week the community does decide to take them down, then just notify them that there was a rule change. Most of the people who had emu times have been very understanding, so if the remaining people, whoever they may be, are not understanding, well it's what the community decides. My point is, it should be all or nothing, not just some times are left up because they're old runs. That wouldn't be fair to everyone else who are abiding by the rules.

Yea adding a colum/putting a [S+Q] indicator seems very drastic just for a strat, which essentially that's all S+Q is, a strat. A majority of the community that posted here seems to be ok with it being unbanned, no marks or no new colums.

It makes very little sense that its banned for Any% but not Low%. It's not an immense time save, so it doesn't pose as such a significant change. And if there's no other reason besides old SDA rules that Vark mentioned, I think it should be allowed.