"How did we get here" speedruns
7 years ago
Georgia, USA
punkband
He/Him, They/Them
7 years ago

I'm not sure how popular this category would/will become, but I've seen a couple of people speedrun obtaining the new advancement "How did we get here", which requires having every potion effect legitimately obtainable in Survival at once.

The only runs I can find were carried out by u/redstonehelper and u/ARN64 over on r/Minecraft

u/redstonehelper's run (3.22hr IGT) https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9X9Asn6WnEhR09jRFRQc0czQnM/view

u/ARN64's run (1:44.53 RT)

Is it something that would be considered for the leaderboard? Even Dinnerbone, the creator of the advancement, mentioned the legitimacy of the run. https://twitter.com/Dinnerbone/status/875774163172155394

Jaro024 그리고 Graystripe 이것을 좋아함
Manitoba, Canada

this is the coolest speedrun ive ever seen

Gelderland, Netherlands

Awesome!

Franche-Comté, France

Since it's set seed, it could be highly improved, would be cool to insert a category, but I don't know if people will get interested since it's very long But I would (:

편집한 사람 작성자 7 years ago
Graystripe 이것을 좋아함
Manitoba, Canada

this would defenitly be something id be willing to learn i say yes to a spot on the leaderboards

The run may be easier than All Achievements if both allow glitches like dup.

  1. Collect some blaze rod, soul sand and wither skull, and kill-dragon equivment, etc(20min, if too long just rerun)
  2. Kill the dragon and a wither, make potion
  3. go overworld to obtain mining failure
  4. Go to the end city, place beacon, summon another wither and have the potions, before mining failure end
Manitoba, Canada

personally, id rather see a glitch and a glitchless category for it

Put it as a category even if it may be hardly possible to see a random seed run

Mexico

It is up a a category now. I expect to see more runs of it soon if it's going to stay.

SpoonTy 이것을 좋아함
Manitoba, Canada

ill get a run going this weekend of it

게임 통계
팔로워
43,409
런들
24,191
플레이어
8,399
최신 뉴스
Rules v2

View the current version of the rules document at

Summary:

  • () Lowered extra proof requirements for 1.16+ RSG to sub-13 for wor
1 month ago
최근 쓰레드
게시 일자 22 days ago
851 개의 답글
게시 일자 2 years ago
11 개의 답글
게시 일자 1 day ago
3 개의 답글
게시 일자 4 days ago
2 개의 답글
게시 일자 10 days ago
0 개의 답글