WR video not available
6 years ago
Newfoundland, Canada

Seems like the video is no longer available for this run.

Germany

I think it‘s still online somewhere on nicovideo. I can take a look later and see if I can find it :)

Germany

hey guys!

I will shortyly start learning this game and run it...so again the question: Do the vods of the first two runners still exist? (also watchable without nico vid account?)

Because i guess they have a kinda different route..otherwise the time difference would not be that immense

Nebraska, USA

the reason the any% route has such a time difference is because no one has bothered to run it (my low% could be submitted to any% and improve my time by over 2 and a half minutes). The RNG required is a bit awful. But the videos are available on nico. If you are planning on running the game I would recommend learning low% as it has way less RNG and is overall a more fun run in my opinion.

Maryland, USA

The only difference in the two categories is gambling which is a frustrating reset point once you get your execution down and the main source of RNG of the run. I also recommend doing low % as it is an execution based run with little RNG reset points

United States

Same as the other guys. The any% run takes a lot of luck to get the coins needed in the mini games. I recommend Low% as well its the best category and there are active runners at the moment that can help out as well! and good luck! let us know if you have any questions about the run

United States

Im wondering now if we should just make Low% the first category in this game instead of any%? the any% runs are way outdated and i do believe that Low% is the best and most friendly category

NerdyNester 그리고 Crankykong 이것을 좋아함
Maryland, USA

I second that idea @KLM1187

NerdyNester 이것을 좋아함
United States

Done! i think it will be more appealing to runners to see Low% first. I reeeaaally would love to rename the category as well to like Any% No Gambling to take any confusion out for new people coming in as well not sure how everyone would feel about that too?

NerdyNester 이것을 좋아함
Maryland, USA

Agreed the category names are confusing

KLM1187 그리고 NerdyNester 이것을 좋아함
Nebraska, USA

I would agree with Any% (No Gambling). Low% implies no items or power-ups to me instead of just the no gambling mini-game restriction.

KLM1187 그리고 NerdyNester 이것을 좋아함
United States

As a runner that is about to start running the game I was very confuse on to which category to start. To me low% is pretty much no power-ups, upgrades, item etc. So I looked at Any% but turns out it has gambling rng which is fine but something I did not want to do starting off. A new name to the low% I feel would help beginners.

KLM1187 그리고 Crankykong 이것을 좋아함
Maryland, USA

With the recent influx of runners I think this change would make the speedrun more appealing and easier to figure out which category to run, I know when I started running this game and the board was dead I went with any % just because that is where you start with other games and LOW% is normally the more advanced category where this is not the case here.

Crankykong, KLM1187, 그리고 NerdyNester 이것을 좋아함
United States

Exactly yeah i feel the same way. i wanted to do any% originally just because thats the norm but the low% category was more appealing to start with. also i definetly agree its not a true low% run and it can be unappealing for newer runners because of what low% usually means

NerdyNester 이것을 좋아함
Maryland, USA

Board looks great @KLM1187 thanks for updating it!

Crankykong, KLM1187, 그리고 NerdyNester 이것을 좋아함
United States

Looks great @KLM1187 pogchamp

KLM1187 이것을 좋아함
United States

i agree i think it will be much better and clearer especially for newer runners!

Crankykong 이것을 좋아함
Germany

Way better. Thanks KLM. Now I just gotta submit a run...

KLM1187 이것을 좋아함
게임 통계
팔로워
59
런들
103
플레이어
24
최근 쓰레드
게시 일자 4 years ago
4 개의 답글
게시 일자 4 years ago
17 개의 답글
게시 일자 5 years ago
4 개의 답글
게시 일자 8 years ago
0 개의 답글