Look. We all know mission 3 is incredibly unreliable. I can reliably finish with some speed mission 1 75% of the time, mission 2 90% of the time. I don't know about you, but I get an even half-decent mission 3 less than 5% of the time.Therefore, I propose a 66% category, finishing missions 1 and 2 together. As a mod, I could put this category in immediately, but I want to hear from you (basically just from Quaintt); should I make this category?

I think the 66% category is a good idea, especially given the frequency that mission 3 softlocks.

Another category that might be worth considering is a run of all of the 2D sections (roughly a 57.143% run, if the baseball bat segment is included). As we know, the FPS sections of mission 1 and 2 are essentially 5+ minutes of minimal gameplay. We also know that the game loves to crash in the FPS sections of missions 1 and 3. Given this, perhaps a category of just the side-scroller sections would improve the pacing and stability of a tri-mission run?

"Kill 'em all in 2D and [not] 3D"?

Yeah that's a good idea, a 2D% category. I don't think the baseball bat segment is really necessary, as we can just assume people will get a 6.8 left (thought a 7.2 left might be possible, I haven't spent much time on it). So for 2D%, complete the 2D section of mission 1, the 2D section of mission 2, and the 2D section of mission 3, in order. For 66%, complete missions 1 and 2. Ok, I will add those categories and define the rules.