Podlaskie, PolandNo problem, would like to see more speedrunners playing this game and this community grow.
@kikons78 this is what I saw vs Komar's. Good comparison.
Moreover, let's not forget that KeeperRavager did use that tool too as AJ said. If AJ's run was deleted, Keeper's runs should be as well. There cannot be only one person punished.
Opinions?
I'm glad you found the courage to respond even though you were not tagged - my bad there.
First of all, as the member of this community, I appreciate you having done the job as moderator in the past - it's you who accepted my run after all. Also, you've probably kept that game alive here.
So nobody but you could accept the run then, I get it. But didn't you think back then that the run was illegal? You gained the advantage with that DiskRAM or whatever the thing is. As I said, all guys in the video had better IGT, but worse RTA, and Tetris who was right behind you was 6 seconds behind. We know that you have been speedrunning years ago, but years after, when there come new speedrunners, it's not fair that people with better IGT are behind. When I was running with new strats recently, I thought "oh I'm gonna get sub22" and I didn't. That pissed me off and led to finding out (by accident) you "playing the game faster". And if I didn't come back, your record could be standing much longer. I was shocked that nobody could beat your time after 5 years, now I know why...
You admitted to using an external app - which in your eyes isn't and wasn't cheating. Now, let's erase word "cheating" and say you did not cheat. However, you still gained a big advantage with that app and I find it unfair that players with better IGT were way behind you.
You have the point that IGT may kill that category but I think that IGT leaderboard is kind of fair because then it allows all people to compete equally. It was proved that wooden PC's only impact loading, not the level flow.
About erasing your time - were I moderator, I'd bring back any% run only if times are sorted by IGT. If not, it would be unfair to other speedrunners. Tutorial% run shouldn't be back. I'm not the person to make the decision here but in my opinion - any% only if there is IGT leaderboard; tutorial% - hell :) no.
All in all, after the case is practically closed, I suggest we all made a vote whether NFH 1 leaderboard should be sorted by IGT or RTA.
And @Avram35 - I suggest you added a new rule to "Game rules" for whole NFH1 and NFH2 too - "Any external applications (eg. RAMDisk, speedhacks) that could help gaining an advantage are forbidden".
Good job @max007_10 , I never thought of speedhack as a tool that AJ could've used.
In response to your post, I'm afraid I have to disagree with you and AJ's explanations. And I disagree that a faster PC was a factor in this case.
First of all,
This game is old and the loading times seem PC dependent, therefore they will tend to a better RTA time.
Were you talking about loads between the levels? Because my post was not about these loads. Of course, I mentioned loads and the fact that AJ's load were slightly faster than mine. The AJ's load before 1st level was about 0.1 seconds faster. But if we consider that there were 9 loads before levels in any% run, then AJ gained only a second in RTA. As I said, loads are not a big factor then.
Keep in mind that as I said, my IGT was 15 seconds better, but RTA only 3 seconds better. So there is no way that AJ gained so much advantage because of loads.
Secondly,
If we say that a faster PC was deciding, then AJ must have a NASA computer. I compared 5 speedrunners with him. And I don't think that all guys have wooden computers. The fact that all runs have been streamed is the proof.
Thirdly,
After @max007_10 mentioned about tutorial%, I did the similar analysis of tutorial% runs. I compared AJ's and Komar's runs. And the same exact thing happened in these runs - every second, AJ's game was going faster by 1-3 frames.
And the most important thing:
I timed AJ's 1st lvl's real time from the beginning when timer starts to the level choice menu after ending the level. We all know that 1st's lvl IGT is 1:11. AJ completed this lvl slightly under less than 1:11. Remember that besides the whole level sequence, real-timer includes menuing - ending the level in 2 parts when you leave the house and confirm ending the level.
In addition, I checked if a second in game timer goes down correctly every second in reality. It did for all except AJ. To sum up, the faster computer couldn't be the factor. So, because of the faster computer, AJ's 1 second in game timer was going faster than 1 second IRL? No, I don't think so. The game couldn't speed itself up because one has a faster PC. It has just no rights to happen.
AJ denied cheating while talking to you. I get it. But after analyzing tutorial% and more analyzis on 1-1, I'm almost 100% sure that AJ cheated.
I agree with you adding IGT but in my opinion, taking into consideration all the proofs, AJ's all leading runs should be erased from the leaderboard.
To all people who are the part of NFH speedrunning community - feel free to express your opinions about the topic.
Hi guys!
After a break, I decided to come back and try with some runs, beginning with any% WR attempts. I did it, but I was only 3 second faster than AJ. The problem is that my in-game time without loads was 15 (!) seconds better. So, I decided to compare mine and AJ's runs and see if my loads were slower (they were by a slight margin but it doesn't matter). But, after I compared first levels frame by frame, I discovered something that is suspicious.
In my opinion, AJ's run is fake as he manipulated time. By every second, every couple frames, his timer was going down faster. As a result, he finished the level second faster than me, and remember that the first level's IGT is 1:11. Basically, you can lose time in this level but in my opinion, it is possible ONLY by missing buttons in menu - finishing the level and beginning the next level slower.
Then, I compared my older run with my newest run only to see that there was no time loss. So, I decided to compare other speedrunners from top5. As it turned out, their IGT overall was better than AJ's which is really important. The first level - the same case - they played the level in the exact same way like me and lost time just like me in comparison to AJ.
I recorded a video in which I compared AJ's first lvl with others, you can watch it here:
What is your opinion - did AJ cheat in some way? Feel free to share opinions.
If mods decide that there is nothing wrong wiith AJ's run and his run is legit, please consider adding in-game time to the main leaderboard for all categories.
/edit Remember that DoltLikeAJ was a NFH1 moderator when he took the World Record and accepted his run by himself. He could do that so that nobody noticed what the did and the fact that he cheated went unnoticed.
