Hello to the SRC Staff @Meta and @starsmiley,

I'd like to take the liberty of asking you to explain the nasuper cheat ban on a video that contains no cheat. This not in my habits to talk like this in public but I don't get your way to operate.

You've sent him that he's using software/hardware or that it's a banned glitch. About the hardware I'd like you tell me which proof you have to say this ? I can tell you quite clearly that when I was a moderator, I sometimes had a suspicion for one or two runs. However, without written proof, it's impossible to assert that the user has used hardware. So have you received an explicit message from nasuper stating that he cheated?

The other point said was the "humanly impossible". Alright, in that case I can show the same kind of speedrun with the same speed or even faster. Then you have to ban all runners with the same speed or faster than nasuper ?

In the message, you also mention another reason: "glitch banned". You need to know whether nasuper has used hardware or whether this kind of glitch is not allowed. From that point of view, I've never seen any announcement from the moderators to the effect that glitch is now banned. So I'd like to know where you got that idea from.

You're not clear. I'd be surprised if you were the one to take a closer look at this run. Someone must have sent you a ticket telling you that this was a humanly impossible run.

But if you look at the comparison, you'll see that it couldn't have been cheated, since the same kind of run can be found.

I'm also sorry to see that for this run, you're told without proof that it's cheated, whereas when nasuper gives you elements for other runs, you get nowhere. I'm not trying to reopen the debate on this, even though I've also sent you elements that are much more concrete than nasuper's and that you've knowingly ignored. In short, it just goes to show that there's a double standard here. You have the right to dislike nasuper for spam or whatever. Nevertheless, he has the same rights as everyone else in terms of treatment. And that treatment isn't fair.

Also, I saw him try hard this run for at least 2 weeks and I can tell you, he didn't used a cheat. Just hard work.

It would be nice to have a minimum of consideration for this ban, which is clearly undeserved.

Especially since you're banning him here without even asking him? If there had been concrete evidence, a direct ban would have been understandable, but here, just word against word, it's nonsense.